Last update:
2016-01-04

Aerial Fumigation with glyphosate in the Putumayo, Colombia

After over a decade of dangerous contamination, aerial fumigation with the pesticide have ended in May 2015. A new anti-drug policy was approved and relocation of families started


Description:

In Colombia, the massive use of aerial fumigation to eradicate coca fields, as part of a strategy called Plan Colombia, has caused pesticide contamination of land and water, and serious health complaints from residents. The multinational firm Monsanto is the major manufacturer and retailer of Round-Up Ultra, a type of glyphosate used to fumigate illegal plantations. Monsanto has said this product is environmentally safe, denying any toxic effects on human health or environment. However, local rural and indigenous communities living in Putumayo, and other regions sprayed by herbicides, have reported that indiscriminate fumigation causes illnesses, destroys food crops and contaminates water supplies. The fumigations are to a large extent financed by US government aid programs. Still after more than ten years of aerial fumigations, their main purpose: the eradication of the coca plantations is far from being achieved.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Aerial Fumigation with glyphosate in the Putumayo, Colombia
Country:Colombia
State or province:Putumayo
Location of conflict:Putumayo
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Biomass and Land Conflicts (Forests, Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock Management)
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Deforestation
Military installations
Agro-toxics
Specific commodities:Land
Pesticides
Water
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

Before the fumigation started the aim was to eradicate 66,000 hectares of coca corps. By the year 2004, there were only 4,400 hectares left. The herbicide used was the glysphosate, which is composed of 74% of water, 18% of salt of glyphosate and 8% of surfactants.

See more
Project area:200000
Level of Investment:7500000
Type of populationRural
Start of the conflict:06/2000
Company names or state enterprises:Monsanto Corporation (Monsanto Co) from United States of America
DynCorp International from United States of America
Relevant government actors:The government of Colombia, The government of the United States, The State Department’s International Narcotics and Law Enforcement, USAID
International and Finance InstitutionsWorld Health Organization (WHO)
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Permanent Peoples Tribunal, ONIC - Colombia, Indigenous and peasant communities of the Putumayo, Accion Ecologica - Ecuador, Defensoria del Pueblo - Colombia, CONAIE - Ecuador, World Rainforest Movement, Amnesty International, Transnational Institute, Alianza Amazonica, Coordinadora Indigena de la Cuenca Amazonica (COICA), Putamayo Womens Alliance, the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), Food & Water Watch
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Women
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Afro-colombian communities
Forms of mobilization:Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Street protest/marches
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Genetic contamination, Soil contamination, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Potential: Air pollution, Global warming, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover
Health ImpactsVisible: Occupational disease and accidents, Infectious diseases, Deaths
Potential: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Other environmental related diseases
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights
Outcome
Project StatusStopped
Conflict outcome / response:Deaths, Assassinations, Murders
New legislation
Under negotiation
Violent targeting of activists
The Monsanto corporation was accused of supplying toxic substances to Colombia, it was charged by the hearing on Biodiversity of the Permanent Peoples Tribunal.
Development of alternatives:A new anti-drug policy in Colombia that invests in development and alternative crop programs that provide farmers a path out of the drug trade.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Yes
Briefly explain:After WHO report asserting the potential risks of glyphosate on humans health, aerial fumigation of the pesticide have ended in May 2015. At the end of 2015, the Colombian National Drugs Council have adopted a new anti-drug policy. The plan considers the relocation of farming families, assisting them to switch crops.
Sources and Materials
Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict

Plan Colombia

Patriot Plan

Alternative Plan to substitute illicit crops called PLANTE

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

Dietrich Heinz. Evaluacion del Plan Colombia en la region andina y el Ecuador.
[click to view]

Tribal Engagement Plan for Indigenous Cultures in Putumayo
[click to view]

Gonzalez Olga. Las mentiras del glifosato.
[click to view]

Resistencia civil de los pueblos indigenas frente al plan Colombia, Matti Mailer, 2004
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Visiones Alternativas
[click to view]

SELVAS - Osservatorio Informativo Indipendente sulle Americhe
[click to view]

Relazione di Heinz Dieterich: valutazione del plan Colombia nella regione Andina
[click to view]

Plan Colombia: resistenza civile dei popoli indigeni, 02/01/2004
[click to view]

Tre anni di Plan Colombia, un anno di presidenza Uribe: "tanti auguri" alla pace sulle Ande…
[click to view]

Fumigazioni: guerra chimica sulle Ande, 10/12/2003
[click to view]

Incontro internazionale della societa’ civile che lotta contro il Plan Colombia
[click to view]

Fumigación e insurgencia, 06/05/2010
[click to view]

Cronologia documentada de las fumigaciones en Colombia (1978-2010)
[click to view]

U.S. Policy in Colombia, Amnesty International
[click to view]

Colombia presenta un nuevo plan de política antidroga, S., Palomino, 23/09/2015
[click to view]

Colombia da un giro en la estrategia de lucha contra el narcotráfico, 16/05/2015
[click to view]

WHO Findings on Glyphosate’s Carcinogenicity Should Be Enough To Halt Colombia’s Controversial U.S.-Backed Coca-Spraying Program, 05/05/2015
[click to view]

Even if Glyphosate Were Safe, Fumigation in Colombia Would Be a Bad Policy. Here's Why, I. Isacson, 29/04/2015
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

Plan Colombia Putumayo, Drug and Democracy
[click to view]

Other documents

Source: http://latincorrespondent.com/2015/09/colombia-will-stop-coca-crop-glyphosate-fumigation/
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Lucie Greyl
Last update04/01/2016
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.