Last update:
2014-09-04

Azura-Edo Independent Power Project Impacts Community People in Edo State, Nigeria

Description:

In Nigeria, demand for power outstrips supply. Power supply is not only epileptic — more than half of the population of 170 million lacks access to power.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Azura-Edo Independent Power Project Impacts Community People in Edo State, Nigeria
Country:Nigeria
State or province:Edo
Location of conflict:Ihovbor, Orior-Osemwende and Idunmwonwina-Urho Nisen, Uhunmwonde Local Government Area
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Land acquisition conflicts
Urban development conflicts
Specific commodities:Land
Electricity
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

102 hectares of land to construct a 450MW Open Cycle Gas Turbine, power station near Benin City in Edo State. It is the first phase of a 1,120MW power plant facility that is targeted to begin producing electricity in early 2017.

Project area:102
Level of Investment:USD 1,000,000,000.00
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:20,000 - 30,000
Company names or state enterprises:Azura Power Holdings from Nigeria
Relevant government actors:Edo State Government
Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC)
Federal Ministry of Power
International and Finance InstitutionsThe World Bank (WB) from United States of America
First City Monument Bank (FCMB) from Nigeria
Standard Chartered Bank from United Kingdom
First Rand Bank (acting through Rand Merchant Bank division) from South Africa
Stanbic IBTC from Nigeria
FMO from Netherlands
FCMB Capital Markets Limited from Nigeria
Corporación financiera Internacional (CFI)
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityLOW (some local organising)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Women
Forms of mobilization:Development of alternative proposals
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Objections to the EIA
Appeals/recourse to economic valuation of the environment
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Global warming, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover
Health ImpactsPotential: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…)
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Increase in violence and crime
Potential: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Specific impacts on women, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Other socio-economic impacts
Outcome
Project StatusUnder construction
Conflict outcome / response:Migration/displacement
Under negotiation
Development of alternatives:ERA/FoEN proposals:
1. Public hearing be conducted on the Azura-Edo IP project to determine its suitability as environmentally compliant project
2. Communities’ prior and informed consent be sought by providing adequate information on the Azura project.
3. The mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA ) process and the legal requirement of public hearing be conducted with communities representatives and CSOs participation.
4. Any social and environmental impacts including mitigation plans should be disclosed to the host communities.
5. Communities should directly benefit from the project through step-down technology built directly as part of project benefits
6. Immediate re-Valuation to ensure adequate and prompt compensation should be paid to allow for proper resettlement plans
7. Alternatives in renewable energy should be considered as part of the global transition effort from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources to checkmate climate change
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:The community people are not adequately informed about the project and their consent is not being sought. There are fears of inadequate compensation and displacement. No proper EIA carried out.
Sources and Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

Environmental Impact Assessment
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Field Report #352: AZURA-EDO IP Project Impacts community people
[click to view]

14 banks syndicate $1b for 450mw Azura-Edo power plant
[click to view]

World Bank Group Approves Project Series to Boost Local Power Output in Nigeria
[click to view]

Azura-Edo IPP: A watershed
[click to view]

POWER: KEY GLOBAL FIRMS INVEST $1 BILLION IN 450 MW AZURA-EDO IPP
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Maria Obaseki, Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria, [email protected]
Last update04/09/2014
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.