Last update:
2014-04-08

Calcite mining in Nimmalapadu village, AP, India

Description:

Nimmalapadu in Andhra Pradesh is mostly tribal dominated area and the residents are mainly farmers. They used to cultivate three crops a year by managing the flow of a small stream into the village.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Calcite mining in Nimmalapadu village, AP, India
Country:India
State or province:Andhra Pradesh
Location of conflict:Nimmalapadu, Chintapalle, Visakhapatnam
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Mineral ore exploration
Specific commodities:Calcite, Magnesium
Project Details and Actors
Project details

Birla Periclase, a subsidiary company of Indian Rayon and Industries was given a lease of 120 acres in Nimmalapadu in 1987. The land was given to extract calcite, one of the principal raw materials for the company's Sea Water Magnesia plant near Bheemunipatnam in Vishakhapatnam district. It was not only the lease that raised the alarm among the adivasis, but also the infrastructure facilities provided by the state government to facilitate the mining operations. The state government shared 50% of the cost of constructing roads, acted as a 'facilitator' to acquire land for a 22 km long road, with width varying from 25ft to 90 ft, and promoted construction of road for the actual operation site in the name of ‘public purpose'[4].

See more
Project area:48.6
Type of populationRural
Start of the conflict:1987
Company names or state enterprises:Birla Periclase from India - a subsidiary company of Indian Rayon and Industries (India)
Indian Rayon and Industries from India
Relevant government actors:Government of Andhra Pradesh
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Samata- a Hyderabad-based NGO, http://samataindia.org.in/, https://www.facebook.com/pages/Samata/118445384842399
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Forms of mobilization:Development of a network/collective action
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil contamination, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity, Mine tailing spills
Socio-economical ImpactsPotential: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place
Outcome
Project StatusStopped
Conflict outcome / response:Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Project cancelled
Development of alternatives:Only cooperative societies run by indigenous local residents should operate in the area.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Yes
Briefly explain:The Court Judgement known as 'Samata judgement' which came after a 10-year struggle. In the judgment known as the Court ruled that the state had no right to grant leases in areas governed by the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution. Only cooperative societies jointly run by tribals could mine in such areas [2]
Sources and Materials
Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict

Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) (PESA) Act

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

A report on Profit Sharing with local communities
[click to view]

THE FIFTH SCHEDULE OF THE CONSTITUTION AND THE SAMATHA JUDGEMENT
[click to view]

Sharing the Wealth of Minerals

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

[click to view]

vs AP.htm
[click to view]

[3] Tribal onslaughts
[click to view]

[1] Mining, people and the environment : The Implications of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement by Chandra Bhushan and Sugandh Juneja
[click to view]

[2] NIMMALAPADU
[click to view]

CPI(M) launches ‘porata yatra against mining
[click to view]

Makireddy: Rallying for adivasi land rights
[click to view]

SAMATA – A PROFILE
[click to view]

Girijans oppose calcite mining
[click to view]

[4] This is our homeland: a collection of essays on the betrayal of adivasi rights in India

Samatha Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Meta information
Contributor:Sohan Prasad Sha & Swapan Kumar Patra
Last update08/04/2014
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.