Last update:

Exploitation of Forests, Cameroon

Since the 1950s, unsustainable logging in Cameroon has threatened rainforest biodiversity and the indigenous communities' survival.


Timber exploitation in Cameroon began with German colonization, and grew rapidly after the Second World War. In the 1990s, timber exporting reached its peak. In 2002, annual production was around 2 million cubic metres over a surface area of some 300,000 hectares. The average price of the timber fluctuated around 150 per cubic metre, and was destined for the luxury goods market due to its high quality. The weakness of State controls or its complicity on the timber trade meant that exporting was problem free. If from the start of the 1900s deforestation was totally unchecked, and was interested only in felling as many trees in the least time possible, today the exploitation of forests is targeting only the most expensive. Six varieties account for nearly 80 percent of timber exploitation: The Ayous (Triplochition scleroxylon), Sapele or Sapelli (Entandrophragma cylindricum), Azob (Lophira alata), Limba or yellow pine (Terminalia superba), Tali (Erythrophleum ivorense) and Iroko (Chlorophora spp.). Another particularly exploited species for its economic value is the Moabi (Baillonella toxisperma), which is a vitally important tree to women forest dwellers due to its versatility in providing medicines, and other subsistence goods. It is also a sacred tree.

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Exploitation of Forests, Cameroon
Accuracy of locationLOW (Country level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Biomass and Land Conflicts (Forests, Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock Management)
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Deforestation
Logging and non timber extraction
Specific commodities:Land
Biological resources
Project Details and Actors
Project details

From the days of colonization until now, almost all the timber felled in Cameroon has been exported to Europe. The main importing nations between 2000 and 2005 were France, Belgium and the Netherlands.

Type of populationRural
Start of the conflict:1950
Company names or state enterprises:Patrice Bois from Italy
Fipcam from Italy
Thanry/Vicwood from China
Pasquet from France
Rougier from France
Pallisco from Cameroon
Relevant government actors:Government of Cameroon, MINEF: Ministry of Environment and Forestry of Cameroon, European Union, French Government
International and Finance InstitutionsThe World Bank (WB) from United States of America
International Monetary Fund (FMI)
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Friends of the Earth (Cameroon), Greenpeace - Belgium & International, Planet Survey - Cameroon, Centre for Environment and Development (CED) - Cameroon
Conflict & Mobilization
Reaction stageUnknown
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Landless peasants
Forms of mobilization:Blockades
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Street protest/marches
Property damage/arson
2003: The residents of Klampeing move their residencies to the three neighbouring villages of Eden, Andoo and Assadam, with the goal of creating a forest community with the official title of ICM COBA (Assimilated Community of Badjou and other interest groups)
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Food insecurity (crop damage), Soil contamination, Soil erosion
Health ImpactsPotential: Violence related health impacts (homicides, rape, etc..), Occupational disease and accidents
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Displacement, Increase in violence and crime, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of livelihood, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Specific impacts on women
Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Corruption
New legislation
Violent targeting of activists
Application of existing regulations
January 2002: The Forest Ministry (MINEF) accuses the company Patrice Bois of unauthorised timber exploitation, and subjects them to a fine of 10 million CFA Francs (15,000 Euros).
January 2003: The Forestry Ministry (MINEF) once again fines the company Patrice Bois, this time it is 50 million CFA Francs (75,000 Euros), for complicity in unauthorised exploitation of the forests. However, due to procedural errors by the Ministry the charge is altered and only a small fine is made. The company are still condemned for breach of forest law.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:On paper, the State owns the forests, but the sovereignty it exercises on the exploitation of timber is in many ways limited by the influence of multinational companies. The national government wants to attract more and more private foreign investment at all costs, even if is basically illegal. This framework allows corporations to disregard the environmental and social standards, particularly with regard to contracts, and the extent and location of concessions. The States monitoring and decision making capability is limited both by the endemic corruption, and internal political policies that have led to a drastic reduction in staff and their salaries.
Sources & Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

Forestry and Communities in Camerooon, CEECEC Case-study, 2010
[click to view]

Africa, forest under threat, World Rainforest Movement. 2002.
[click to view]

Auzel, P., Fomete, T., Odi, J., Owada, J.-C. 2002. Evolution de l'exploitation des forets du Cameroun: production nationale, exploitation illegale, perspectives, Presentation reunion DFID, MINEF, Banque Mondiale et FMI, 2002, Yaounde.

Global Witness : Independent Forest Monitoring (IFM), 2000-2005
[click to view]

[3] Environmental Values. Valuation Contests over the Commoditisation of the Moabi Tree in South-Eastern Cameroon (Veuthey & Gerber 2011)
[click to view]

Gerber J.F., Resistance contre deux geants industriels en foret tropicale, populations locales versus plantations commerciales d'hévéas et de palmiers a huile dans le Sud Cameroun, Mouvement Mondial pour les Forets Tropicales, 2008.
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Bantu Peoples
[click to view]

Rapport d'Analyse des données du SIGIF de l’exercice 2002/2003
[click to view]

Illegal logging in Cameroon, F. Verbelen, Greenpeace, Belgium, March 2000
[click to view]

Pygmy Peoples
[click to view]

Chainsaw criminal Wijma, Greenpeace, April 2003
[click to view]

The 'Pygmies', Survival International
[click to view]

[1] Cameroon Statistics by
[click to view]

Cameroon: Bagyeli struggling to be heard, World Rainforest Movement, 2002
[click to view]

Southeast Cameroon, a story of land theft, Survival International
[click to view]

[2] #Cameroun / L'impossible vérification des documents légaux liés aux permis d’exploitation des entreprises forestières, F/ Pigeaud, Gri-Gri International / Mediapart, 2/09/2015
[click to view]

Illegal logging in Cameroon: How French Government action is fuelling rainforest destruction, Greenpeace, 2005
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Lucie Greyl, updated by Dalena Tran
Last update08/01/2021
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.