Last update:
2017-12-07

Opposition to Keystone XL in Nebraska, United States

In November 2017 Nebraska approves Keystone XL 'Alternative Mainland' Route despite 210,000 Gallon Oil Spill from the Keystone Pipeline In South Dakota days before.


Description:

Despite a large oil spill from the existing Keystone pipeline in South Dakota just days before the Nebraska Public Service Commission (PSC) announced their final decision, the Keystone XL pipeline won approval on November 20, 2017. It was, however, not all good news for TransCanada Corp., the Canadian company proposing to build the pipeline, as the PSC did not grant approval to their desired route, instead approving the ‘mainline alternative route.’[1]

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Opposition to Keystone XL in Nebraska, United States
Country:translation missing: en.countries.united_states_of_america
State or province:Nebraska
Location of conflict:Lincoln
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Fossil Fuels and Climate Justice/Energy
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Land acquisition conflicts
Transport infrastructure networks (roads, railways, hydroways, canals and pipelines)
Specific commodities:Crude oil
Land
Water
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

The Keystone XL pipeline is a proposed 36-inch-diameter crude oil pipeline. Covering a total distance of 1,897km from Hardisty, Alberta, to Steele City, Nebraska, USA, the pipeline has the potential to carry 830,000 barrels of oil per day [6]. Keystone XL would mostly carry Canadian crude extracted from the oil fields in northern Alberta, in order to more easily bring Canadian oil to the refineries along the Gulf Coast; however, it will also carry some, albeit a comparably smaller amount, of oil extracted in the United States [6].

See more
Project area:189,600
Level of Investment:7,000,000,000
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:1,710
Start of the conflict:10/11/2011
Company names or state enterprises:TransCanada Corp. from Canada
Relevant government actors:Federal Government of the United States of America
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Nebraska Public Service Commission
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:The Sierra Club (https://www.sierraclub.org/topics/keystone-xl)
Bold Alliance - Bold Nebraska (http://boldnebraska.org/)
350.org (https://350.org/stop-keystone-xl/)
Audubon Nebraska (http://ne.audubon.org/)
Guardians of the Good Life (https://guardiansofthegoodlife.wordpress.com/)
Nebraska Farmers Union (http://nebraskafarmersunion.org/)
Nebraska Green Party (http://nebraskagreens.org/)
Nebraska League of Conservation Voters (http://nlcv.org/)
Nebraska Wildlife Federation (http://www.nebraskawildlife.org/)
Landowners of Nebraska
The Ponca Tribe of Nebraska
Yankton Sioux Tribe
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
International ejos
Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Social movements
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Ranchers, landowners
Forms of mobilization:Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsPotential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Global warming, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil contamination, Oil spills, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality
Health ImpactsVisible: Mental problems including stress, depression and suicide
Potential: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…)
Socio-economical ImpactsPotential: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Violations of human rights
Outcome
Project StatusProposed (exploration phase)
Conflict outcome / response:Court decision (undecided)
New legislation
Strengthening of participation
Fostering a culture of peace
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Approval of Alternative Route
Developing Alternatives As A Form Of Resistance
Development of alternatives:The Solar XL Project is a campaign to build solar panels in the path of the Keystone XL pipeline as a form of resistance, and to show the contrast between clean renewable energy and dirty energy [8]. For more information on this project see the youtube video produced by 350.org in the Sources and Materials Section.
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:It is hard to say whether or not environmental justice has been served. The alternative route might divert the pipeline from those who were originally in its path; however, new landowners now find themselves in its path. Also, the alternative route still crosses the sensitive environmental area of the Nebraska Sandhills, and the vital Ogallala aquifer. Those who have managed to divert the pipeline away from their land might consider this a victory; however, it is difficult to call this a victory for the environmental justice movement until this pipeline is dead once and for all.
Sources and Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[7] Ponca Tribe. 2017. "Ponca Tribe Culture and History."
[click to view]

[2] Hefflinger, Mark. 2017. “Keystone XL Partially Denied; Landowners Vow to Keep Fighting.” Bold Nebraska
[click to view]

[3] CBC. 2017. “Nebraska Oks ‘alternative route’ for Keystone XL pipeline” Canadian Broadcasting Company.
[click to view]

[5] Hefflinger, Mark. 2017. “Landowners, Bold Alliance and Sierra Club Argue Keystone XL Not in the Public Interest in Closing Briefs to Public Service Commission.” Bold Nebraska.
[click to view]

[6] BBC. 2017. "Keystone XL pipeline: Why is it so disputed?." British Broadcasting Company
[click to view]

[1] Haavardsrud, Paul. 2017. “Keystone XL clears final hurdle only to see more hurdles”. Canadian Broadcasting Company.
[click to view]

[4] Elbein, Saul. 2017. “The Keystone XL Pipeline Fight is Not Over Yet” Rolling Stone Magazine.
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Bold Nebraska webpage. Information about their fight against Keystone XL
[click to view]

Omaha-World Herald on Keystone XL alternative route approval
[click to view]

Hammel, Paul .2017. "Nebraska PSC grants landowners' request, sets hearing over next steps on Keystone XL pipeline." Omaha-World Herald.
[click to view]

[9] No one wants the Keystone XL pipeline, but Nebraska just approved it anyway. The existing Keystone pipeline spilled over 200,000 gallons of oil last week. Natasha Geiling. Nov 20, 2017
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

[8] Solar XL - A Wave of Renewable Energy Resistance

Published by 360.org
[click to view]

Other documents

Solar XL Bold Nebraska's Solar Farm in the path of the Keystone XL pipeline
[click to view]

Give Keystone XL The Boot March Give Keystone XL The Boot March in Lincoln, Nebraska. Aug 6, 2017.
[click to view]

No KXL Heartland Nebraska Crop Art
[click to view]

Other comments:In November 2017, "An independent, five-person panel voted to approve an alternative route for TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline ... But the decision to approve an alternative route for the pipeline, rather than TransCanada’s preferred route, could open up a new set of issues for the Canadian energy company, which may need to reapply for permits with the Bureau of Land Management and Army Corps of Engineers, as well as potentially obtain a new review from the State Department".[9]
Meta information
Contributor:James Joshua Young - [email protected] - Lund University
Last update07/12/2017
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.