Last update:
2015-05-07

Pollution from hog farming (CAFOs), USA


Description:

Over the past decade, the number of hog producers in the state of North Carolina has fallen from 23,000 to 8,000, but the number of hogs in the state has nearly tripled. North Carolina went from fifteenth to second in hog production in the United States between the mid-1980s and mid-1990s (http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/121-a182/).

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Pollution from hog farming (CAFOs), USA
Country:translation missing: en.countries.united_states_of_america
State or province:North Carolina
Location of conflict:Halifax
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Biomass and Land Conflicts (Forests, Agriculture, Fisheries and Livestock Management)
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Intensive food production (monoculture and livestock)
Specific commodities:Land
Live Animals
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

7.5 million hogs create 15.5 millions tons of waste per year.

See more
Project area:129
Type of populationRural
Start of the conflict:1991
Company names or state enterprises:Smithfield Foods, Inc from United States of America - recently bought by Shuanghui, a Chinese company
Relevant government actors:North Carolina State Legislature, state Attorney General
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Alliance for Responsible Swine Industry, Halifax Environmental Loss Prevention, Neuse River Foundation, Institute for Southern Studies, Concerned Citizens of Tillery (CCT)
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Local ejos
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Forms of mobilization:Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Floods (river, coastal, mudflow), Waste overflow, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems
Other Environmental impactsOdor
Health ImpactsVisible: Occupational disease and accidents, Other Health impacts
Other Health impactsasthma
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Loss of landscape/sense of place
Potential: Loss of livelihood
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area
New legislation
Strengthening of participation
Development of alternatives:A few pioneers who are implementing environmentally superior technologies (ESTs) are creating what could be the future of hog farming. One of these involves a sustainable operation that generates renewable energy and carbon offsets. Google has partnered with Duke University and Duke energy to turn Yadkin County’s Lloyd Ray Farms into such an operation. In this project, methane from hog waste is captured using an anaerobic digester and this methane provides fuel to run a microturbine that powers part of the farm and supports components that reduce odors, nutrients, pathogens, and heavy metals. The carbon credits are shared by Google and Duke University while Duke Energy receives the renewable energy certificates (RECs). (http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/121-a182/).
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:Not Sure
Briefly explain:Farming activities are still ongoing
Sources and Materials
Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict

Intensive Livestock Ordinance passed in 1992 which prevented 3 out of 7 hog farms from opening in Halifax County

North Carolina House Bill 515 was passed in 1997 which gave counties the power to pass zoning amendments to control hog farm location
[click to view]

2007 Swine Farm Environmental Performance Standards Act, which banned new lagoons and mandated that any new or expanded CAFOs must use environmentally superior technologies (ESTs) to substantially reduce emissions and prevent waste discharges into surface and ground waters

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

(1) 'CAFOs and Environmental Justice: The Case of North Carolina.' Environmental Health Perspectives 121.6 (2013): 182-90. Environmental Health Perspectives.; (2) Horton, Jen. 'The Siting of Hog CAFOs in Eastern North Carolina: A Case of Environmental Inj
[click to view]

THE SITING OF HOG CAFOS IN EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA: A CASE OF ENVIRONMENTAL INJUSTICE?
[click to view]

CAFOs and Environmental Justice: The Case of North Carolina
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

[click to view]

NC hog farm threatened with citizen lawsuit over water pollution
[click to view]

Other documents

Sign protesting water pollution as a result of hog farming practices
[click to view]

Map of hog farms in North Carolina watersheds 1997
[click to view]

Map of North Carolina hog operations
[click to view]

Hog lagoon Permitted by North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
[click to view]

CAFO image
[click to view]

CAFO image 2
[click to view]

Hog waste applied to spray fields
[click to view]

Other comments:This is one of the top 40 influential environmental justice cases in the United States identified from a national survey of environmental activists, scholars and other leaders by graduate students at the University of Michigan
Local grassroots groups have been largely supported by larger non-profits and NGOs including Food and Water Watch, Clean Water Network, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
Meta information
Contributor:Bernadette Grafton, [email protected], University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment
Last update07/05/2015
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.