Last update:
2019-02-05

Rhéébù Nùù group and Vale mining, New Caledonia

A refinery in New Caledonia is using acid to extract nickel and cobalt, polluting the air with mercury and contaminating the seafood upon which local Indigenous communities rely for sustenance.


Description:

New Caledonia, a Pacific archipelago, is a biodiversity “hotspot” with exceptionally high numbers of endemic species that are severely threatened, especially by mining activity. Administered by France since 1853, New Caledonia has a population of approximately 269,000, comprised of several ethnic groups, primarily Melanesians known as Kanak (40 percent), and people of European ancestry (29 percent). Mined since 1874, New Caledonia currently hosts over 30 active mine sites, some run by locally-based entrepreneurs and others by multinational corporations. Grande Terre, the main island, is estimated to possess nearly 25 percent of the world’s nickel reserves and is the second largest producer of ferronickel and fifth greatest source of nickel ore. Vale’s “Southern Refinery” project, at first named Goro Nickel and now officially called Vale Nouvelle-Calédonie, is located at the southern tip of the main island of New Caledonia. It involves mining nickel and cobalt, as well as construction of a refinery that uses hydrometallurgical technology. In this procedure, never before implemented in New Caledonia, acid under pressure leaches nickel and cobalt from the ore, with effluent discharged into the sea. Vale completed a pilot refinery in 1999 and the commercial refinery in 2008. Operations are continuing, despite delays caused by acid leaks in 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2014 (both the first and most recent of which devastated the local freshwater ecosystem), and the effluent diffuser’s rupture in 2013. Rhéébù Nùù, a group led entirely by Kanak, was formed in 2002 to focus on the Southern Refinery. While not entirely opposed to the mining project, these protestors had concerns about its potential environmental impacts, particularly on the marine resources upon which the local population depends for subsistence and livelihood. Rhéébù Nùù, and the villagers they represented, were especially concerned about what was popularly known as “the pipe”, the diffuser that would transport waste products, including neutralized sulfuric acid and dissolved metals, into the Havannah Canal, where local people fish. The most dangerous impact has been almost entirely ignored: mercury from the coal-fired power plant, which will contaminate local seafood, upon which the communities depend for sustenance. They were also concerned that Kanak would not benefit adequately from employment with the project, as evidenced by the company importing Filipino workers for the construction phase. Believing that local residents needed to keep an “eye” on the project, they named the group Rhéébù Nùù, “eye of the country” in the indigenous language Numèè. For six years, Rhéébù Nùù leaders initiated a series of actions including pamphlets denouncing the company’s activities, public meetings at local villages, open letters sent to political leaders, legal action in the courts, and blockades of the construction site which turned into violent encounters with armed police. In early 2008, Vale began laying the submarine pipeline for its effluent diffuser, sparking fresh protests and blockades, especially at nearby Ouen Island. However, in September 2008, four Rhéébù Nùù leaders, twenty-five customary authorities and two Goro Nickel representatives signed a “Pact for Sustainable Development of the Far South [of New Caledonia]”. Through this agreement, the mining company committed to creating both a Corporate Foundation to fund local development initiatives and a “Consultative Customary Environmental Committee” composed of senior male customary authorities who could recommend further studies, to recruiting and training ten local youth as “environmental technicians”, and to an extensive reforestation program. In exchange, Rhéébù Nùù members committed to “assert their point of view not through violent or illegal actions, but by dialogue”. 



UPDATE Feb 2019: Vale confirmed a massive investment of 500 millions of dollars [1] for the period 2019-2022, to meet the increasing demand of nickel and cobalt by the electric automobile industry. In a citation reported in the newspaper ""Il s'agit d'un signe de confiance dans la transformation du marché. Jusqu'alors, on exportait pour les aciéries mais nous sommes en train de changer complètement de pied, vers des segments de marché qui demandent un nickel premium, notamment pour les batteries des voitures électriques", stated Antonin Beurrier, CEO of Vale-NC [1].

Production is aimed to increase from 35,000 to 50,000 tonnes of nickel within ten years. Cobalt extraction is projected to amount to 2,000 tonnes in 2019 [1].

Yet, increased concern in Nouvelle Caledonie for dam safety after the tragedy in Brumadinho (Brazil, 25th Jan 2019), urged all dams in the country to be put in greater safety. It also urged Vale to scrap a waste park project called PGA Prony Pernod (which would included a 4 km long and 80 m high dam. Vale Nouvelle-Calédonie then announced a new project, "Lucy", for storing dried waste [2].
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Rhéébù Nùù group and Vale mining, New Caledonia
Country:New Caledonia
State or province:Province sud
Location of conflict:Goro
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict: 1st level:Mineral Ores and Building Materials Extraction
Type of conflict: 2nd level :Mineral ore exploration
Mineral processing
Specific commodities:Nickel and Cobalt
Project Details and Actors
Project details:

4500 containers of nickel and cobalt will be exported annually

See more
Project area:26,000
Level of Investment:$4,000,000,000
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:1,000
Start of the conflict:2002
End of the conflict:2008
Company names or state enterprises:Vale (Vale) from Brazil
Relevant government actors:Province Sud
government of New Caledonia
France
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Rheebu Nuu
Ensemble pour la Planete http://www.eplp.asso.nc/
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Industrial workers
Local ejos
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Social movements
Women
Ethnically/racially discriminated groups
Fisher people
Forms of mobilization:Blockades
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Involvement of national and international NGOs
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Objections to the EIA
Official complaint letters and petitions
Property damage/arson
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Soil contamination, Waste overflow, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Potential: Air pollution, Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Soil erosion, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Other Environmental impacts, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Food insecurity (crop damage), Mine tailing spills
Other Environmental impactsacid spills
marine pollution
mercury contamination
Health ImpactsPotential: Accidents, Occupational disease and accidents
Socio-economical ImpactsPotential: Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment
Outcome
Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Criminalization of activists
Court decision (victory for environmental justice)
Application of existing regulations
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:The company provided some money for local projects, but otherwise is proceeding as planned, despite its environmental and social impacts. The most dangerous impact has been almost entirely ignored: mercury from the coal-fired power plant, which will contaminate local seafood, upon which the communities depend for sustenance.
Sources and Materials
References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

VALE - Pacte pour un Développement Durable du Grand Sud (2013)
[click to view]

Horowitz, L.S. 2010. “Twenty years is yesterday”: Science, multinational mining, and the political ecology of trust in New Caledonia. Geoforum 41(4): 617-626.
[click to view]

Horowitz, L.S. 2012. Translation alignment: Actor-Network Theory, resistance, and the power dynamics of alliance in New Caledonia. Antipode 44(3): 806-827.
[click to view]

Horowitz, L.S. 2016. Rhizomic resistance meets arborescent assemblage: UNESCO World Heritage and the disempowerment of indigenous activism in New Caledonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 106(1): 167-185.
[click to view]

Horowitz, L.S. 2009. Environmental violence and crises of legitimacy in New Caledonia. Political Geography 28(4): 248-258.
[click to view]

Horowitz, L.S. 2015. Culturally articulated neoliberalisation: Corporate Social Responsibility and the capture of indigenous legitimacy in New Caledonia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40(1): 88-101.
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

OEIL - Observatoire sur l'Environnment
[click to view]

Wikipedia on Rheebu Nuu
[click to view]

Nouvelle Calédonie - Rhéébu Nùù / Vale : une semaine de dialogue (2015)
[click to view]

[1] Le véhicule électrique sauve Vale Nouvelle-Calédonie

SYLVIE RANTRUA

PUBLIÉ LE 11/12/2018 À 14H19, MIS À JOUR LE 14/12/2018
[click to view]

[2] Les Nouvelles Calédonieenes - Risque barrage : les autorités rassurent

J.-F.G. | Crée le 29.01.2019
[click to view]

Other documents

Press review on Vale in NC Source: http://www.oeil.nc/fr/page/revue-de-presse-2013
[click to view]

View over the mining site Source: https://www.usinenouvelle.com/article/vale-investit-en-nouvelle-caledonie.N780999
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Leah S. Horowitz, University of Wisconsin-Madison, [email protected]
Last update05/02/2019
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.