Last update:
2014-07-15

Thervoy SEZ, TN, India

Description:

A Special Economic Zone (SEZ) has been proposed at Therovy Kandigai village in the Thiruvallur district of Tamil Nadu. The Village is located about 50 km northwest of Chennai the capital of Tamil Nadu [1].

See more
Basic Data
Name of conflict:Thervoy SEZ, TN, India
Country:India
State or province:Tamil Nadu
Location of conflict:Thervoy Kandigai; District of Tiruvallur
Accuracy of locationHIGH (Local level)
Source of Conflict
Type of conflict. 1st level:Industrial and Utilities conflicts
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Land acquisition conflicts
Specific commodities:Land
Water
Project Details and Actors
Project details

The Special Economic Zone (SEZ) is proposed on about 1,500 acres of 'meikkal poromboke' (wasteland) at Therovy Kandigai village in the Thiruvallur district of Tamil Nadu. However, the land is rich in herbs, fruits and wildlife and also serves as a catchment area in this village. State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT) is responsible to develop the SEZ. A number of global Multinationals are going to start their operations in this SEZ. These include French multinational Michelin, Harsha Glass, Tropical Breweries [1]

Project area:405
Type of populationRural
Affected Population:50,000-1,00,000
Start of the conflict:2007
Company names or state enterprises:State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu (SIPCOT) from India - Owner
Harsha Industries from India
Michelin from France
Relevant government actors:Government of Tamil Nadu, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, National Human Rights Commission
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Movement Against Special Economic Zones in Tamil Nadu, Thervoy Kandigai women's self-help groups, Thervoy Girama Makkal Nala sangam, Dalit Mannurumai Kootamayaippu, National Alliance of People's Movements, Unorganised Workers Federation, Pennurumai Iyyakkam, Association for the Rural Poor
(some political parties also showed solidarity to the movements: AIDMK, DMDK , CPI, CPIM VCK, BSP, and MDMK)
Conflict and Mobilization
IntensityHIGH (widespread, mass mobilization, violence, arrests, etc...)
Reaction stageIn REACTION to the implementation (during construction or operation)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Indigenous groups or traditional communities
Informal workers
Local ejos
Landless peasants
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Social movements
Women
Local scientists/professionals
Forms of mobilization:Blockades
Boycotts of official procedures/non-participation in official processes
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Objections to the EIA
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Strikes
Hunger strikes and self immolation
Impacts of the project
Environmental ImpactsVisible: Loss of landscape/aesthetic degradation, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover, Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems, Reduced ecological / hydrological connectivity, Groundwater pollution or depletion
Potential: Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Desertification/Drought, Air pollution, Soil contamination
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Displacement, Loss of livelihood, Militarization and increased police presence, Violations of human rights, Land dispossession, Loss of landscape/sense of place, Increase in Corruption/Co-optation of different actors
Potential: Increase in violence and crime, Lack of work security, labour absenteeism, firings, unemployment, Loss of traditional knowledge/practices/cultures, Specific impacts on women
Other socio-economic impactsCooptation of NGO sector by private companies [3]
Outcome
Project StatusUnder construction
Conflict outcome / response:Compensation
Environmental improvements, rehabilitation/restoration of area
Court decision (undecided)
Migration/displacement
Repression
Strengthening of participation
Under negotiation
Violent targeting of activists
New Environmental Impact Assessment/Study
Development of alternatives:Activists say that SIPCOT has acquired the land without the consent of the villagers. So they demand the industrial park should stop all construction activities and should be closed [3].
According to the activists, the companies which are located in the park have violated environmental norms.
Mobilizers ask that [3]:
• Immediate Closure of SIPCOT industrial park and the companies coming therein
• using the illegality of abiding by PRI resolution, when Gram Sabha has ruled otherwise,
• against the wishes of public hearing
• without proper pollution control clearance for SIPCOT industrial park and
• no evidence of agreement on handing of Mekkal porombokku land to PRI and JFM committee being cancelled
• AMPLE EVIDENCE OF LOSS TO OUR AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK, WATER, FUEL, HERBS, BODILY INTEGRITY
• Reestablishments of tanks, check dams and trees destroyed
• Dropping of all cases pending against men and women of the village, including false cases foisted by Michellin Tyre company
• Action against perpetrators of violence against our right to protest for our right to grazing land, forest, livelihood and bodily integrity:
• Compensation for loss of livelihoods, livestock, wounds and torture
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:Despite having gone through legal actions and many protests, local residents and supporting social movements did not see their demands beign implemented by the government.
Sources and Materials
Related laws and legislations - Juridical texts related to the conflict

SEZ act 2005 india
[click to view]

References to published books, academic articles, movies or published documentaries

[2] A Study on the Perceived Loss of Common Property Resources (CPR) By Thervoy Kandigai Villagers, Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu.
[click to view]

“Environment and Social Impact Study of the Implementation of an industrial Zone: Thervoy village of Tamil Nadu", by Professor Lakshmanan from Madras Institute of Development Studies
[click to view]

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

Anbulla kaadu (My beloved forest): Madhumita Dutta
[click to view]

[1] Village refuses to part with forest
[click to view]

[3] Tale Of A Village's Struggle For Survival
[click to view]

[4] Thervoy villagers protest against SEZ
[click to view]

Timeline of the conflict by Integrated Rural Development Society -IRDS (in Spanish)
[click to view]

Multinationals Observatory, Was Michelin involved in human rights abuse in India?
[click to view]

Related media links to videos, campaigns, social network

Anbulla Kadu (Beloved Forest)
[click to view]

Other documents

People near Chennai plan protest against industrial estate Source: http://www.downtoearth.org.in/content/village-refuses-part-forest
[click to view]

Meta information
Contributor:Swapan Kumar Patra
Last update15/07/2014
Comments
Legal notice / Aviso legal
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to improve our services. By clicking "Accept cookies" you consent to place cookies when visiting the website. For more information, and to find out how to change the configuration of cookies, please read our cookie policy. Utilizamos cookies para realizar el análisis de la navegación de los usuarios y mejorar nuestros servicios. Al pulsar "Accept cookies" consiente dichas cookies. Puede obtener más información, o bien conocer cómo cambiar la configuración, pulsando en más información.