Please zoom in or out and select the base layer according to your preference to make the map ready for printing, then press the Print button above.

Energy Answers Incinerator Poisoning Main Agricultural Region, Puerto Rico


Description:

Since 1980 the Puertorrican government has tried to instate an incinerator twice, but the project was halted by groups of citizens who fought against it. Energy Answers has now applied to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Rural Utilities Service hoping to win government financing to construct a municipal waste incinerator in Arecibo. Though it’s billed as a “waste-to-energy” facility, the project is little more than an incinerator. It would burn 2,100 tons of solid waste every day, sending plumes of toxic ash and pollutants, including lead and dioxins, into an area that is already plagued by noxious air. Even without a new incinerator, the region’s pollution already violates the Clean Air Act’s lead standard. Arecibo is the site of many polluting industrial activities, including a battery recycling operation, which resulted in Arecibo being declared a non-attainment zone by the U.S. EPA for exceeding limits on lead pollution in the air. Their operation will take 2.1 million gallons per day from Reserva Natural Caño Tiburones and will pollute Puerto Rico's most developed agricultural region with ashes. Energy Answers claims to be fully equipped with filters to control air pollutants but there have been studies that show that this chimneys will leak nano toxins called dioxins which are linked to many deformations, cancer and even genetic mutation. Also this dioxins will eventually land on grass eaten by the cattle in the area and poison even a broader spectrum of people. When Energy Answers prepared its environmental impact statement, it failed to consider the project’s effect on species living outside of the immediate construction site of the project. But the incinerator’s toxic air emissions would travel far beyond the immediate footprint of the incinerator and pose a risk to wildlife in the region’s state forests and conservation areas.

The company claims it will handle approximately 2100 tons of solid waste each day and studies of neighboring communities have demonstrated that they do not have the capacity to fulfill its waste necessities. Because of this the government is trying to force contracts to municipalities on the North side of the island to make them manage their waste thru Energy Answers. This type of project needs to be approved by the U.S Corps of Engineers (USACE), EPA, and Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales de Puerto Rico (DRNA). Besides the project will cost 650 million dollar which is another step closer for bankruptcy for Puerto Rico.

The incinerator is one of the most expensive and polluting ways to address waste, as well as one of the most expensive and polluting ways to produce electricity. Despite substantial public opposition and the availability of more economically beneficial and less environmentally harmful ways to handle waste—and the fact that Puerto Rico’s current electricity generation is already over capacity—the USDA is still considering the project. Even the municipalities whose waste would be burned in the incinerator are opposed to the project.

Basic Data

Name of conflict:Energy Answers Incinerator Poisoning Main Agricultural Region, Puerto Rico
Country:Puerto Rico
Location of conflict:Arecibo
Accuracy of locationMEDIUM (Regional level)

Source of Conflict

Type of conflict. 1st level:Waste Management
Type of conflict. 2nd level:Agro-toxics
Incinerators
Specific commodities:Domestic municipal waste

Project Details and Actors

Project details

The project will have an intake of 2.1M Gallons of water per day coming from Reserva Natural Caño Tiburones. Using this water it will incinerate approximately 2100 tons of waste each day. Their plan will generate 77MW, Puerto Rico consumed(2014-2015) 17,280 millions of kWh.

Project area:123
Level of Investment:650,000,000
Type of populationUrban
Company names or state enterprises:Energy Answers - author
Environmental justice organizations (and other supporters) and their websites, if available:Earthjustice - http://earthjustice.org/blog/2016-march/shutting-down-a-wasteful-plan-in-puerto-rico

Conflict & Mobilization

IntensityMEDIUM (street protests, visible mobilization)
Reaction stagePREVENTIVE resistance (precautionary phase)
Groups mobilizing:Farmers
Industrial workers
Informal workers
Local government/political parties
Neighbours/citizens/communities
Pastoralists
Social movements
Wastepickers, recyclers
Women
Local scientists/professionals
Religious groups
Forms of mobilization:Artistic and creative actions (eg guerilla theatre, murals)
Community-based participative research (popular epidemiology studies, etc..)
Creation of alternative reports/knowledge
Development of a network/collective action
Development of alternative proposals
Lawsuits, court cases, judicial activism
Media based activism/alternative media
Official complaint letters and petitions
Public campaigns
Street protest/marches
Arguments for the rights of mother nature

Impacts

Environmental ImpactsVisible: Air pollution, Genetic contamination, Biodiversity loss (wildlife, agro-diversity), Soil contamination, Large-scale disturbance of hydro and geological systems
Potential: Food insecurity (crop damage), Surface water pollution / Decreasing water (physico-chemical, biological) quality, Deforestation and loss of vegetation cover
Health ImpactsVisible: Exposure to unknown or uncertain complex risks (radiation, etc…), Other environmental related diseases
Potential: Malnutrition
Other Health impactsCancer, Genetic Mutation
Socio-economical ImpactsVisible: Other socio-economic impacts
Other socio-economic impactsbrings a large dept to a country on the brink of bankrupcy

Outcome

Project StatusIn operation
Conflict outcome / response:Criminalization of activists
Do you consider this an environmental justice success? Was environmental justice served?:No
Briefly explain:The process of acquiring the permits and the development of the contracts between Energy Answers and the Puertorrican government was all made in the dark without the consultation of citizens, which is mandated by law.

Sources & Materials

Links to general newspaper articles, blogs or other websites

"local scientist against the incinerator", Newspaper article
http://www.primerahora.com/noticias/puerto-rico/nota/cientificosinsistenenqueincineradoradeareciborepresentapeligroparacomunidadylosninos-1061416/

energy consumption in PR
http://energia.pr.gov/datos/consumo-total-en-millones-de-kwh/

protesting group site; Newspaper article
https://prohibidoincinerar.org/2013/06/30/claridad-la-trampa-de-la-incineradora-en-arecibo/

red alert incinerator in arecibo
http://www.80grados.net/alerta-roja-incinerador-en-arecibo/

EPA's final permit for energy answer's incinerator in Arecibo
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/energy_answers_final_permit_april_20141_0.pdf

Energy Answers official site
http://www.energyanswers.com

Citizen's soliciting EPA to not expedite the final permit
https://yosemite.epa.gov/oa/EAB_Web_Docket.nsf/Filings%20By%20Appeal%20Number/2330C39F9F93F78485257BB1006C3181/$File/Exhibit%201%20--%20Negron%20Sierra%20Club%20Written%20Comment%20...10.19.pdf

A FIGHT WORTH FIGHTING: WASTE INCINERATION IN PUERTO RICO

By Hannah Chang | Tuesday, October 06, 2015
http://earthjustice.org/blog/2015-october/a-fight-worth-fighting-waste-incineration-in-puerto-rico

Meta information

Contributor:JuanManuel Torres Gutierrez from the economy department at Universidad de Puerto Rico recinto de Mayagüez
Last update13/06/2017

Images

 

Local protest

taken from presenciapr.com

Local effort for zero waste program.